What is a good example of why you would want to restrict user or role permissions at the field level?

A good example is to restrict some fields for several roles are SEO related fields. So they should only updated by SEO teams and by any role.

I believe that for a website, we have two types of information: frequently updated content and site-wide information (such as structure, taxonomy, and corporate pages). The second type of information may undergo changes through a special workflow, and even though it is related to common content types, it is better to control access at the field level. By granting explicit rights to authorized roles, we can ensure that only the designated roles have the ability to modify specific fields. This approach provides better control and security over the site-wide information, allowing for more precise management of access and modifications.

For instance, imagine you have a content management system for a healthcare organization. Within the patient records, there may be fields containing personal medical information, such as diagnoses, treatment plans, or medication details. In this case, you would want to restrict access to these fields only to authorized healthcare professionals or roles, such as doctors or nurses. By implementing field-level permissions, you can ensure that non-authorized users, like administrative staff or external stakeholders, cannot access or modify this sensitive medical data.

A good example is the SEO field. Usually, this field is setup by an SEO specialist and we shouldn’t allow other users to edit it.

You may want to allow people to update on-page content but not let them update metadata, especially URLs.